An argument in favor of animal research

Vaccinations for polio, tuberculosis, and diphtheria have all been developed through research on animals. The grounds of our obligations to humans and to animals are complicated. To animate life, even in its simplest forms, we give a certain natural reverence. Are the scientific discoveries made through animal testing really worth less than the lives of test animals?

If animals do not have the same rights as humans, it becomes permissible to use them for research purposes. Both infants and the mentally handicapped frequently lack complex cognitive capacities, full autonomy, or even both of these traits. The differing targets, contents and sources of rights and their inevitable conflict together weave a tangled web.

Animal care technicians, veterinarians, and scientists are all dedicated to the welfare of laboratory animals. You can also track the progress of your order via your account page. The most notable medications developed through animal testing include penicillin, insulin, and the polio vaccine.

For example bacteriafruit flies, and plants would be preferred over mammals. Once animals have been excluded from the moral community, humans have only a limited obligation towards them; on this argument, we certainly would not need to grant animals all normal human rights.

Yes, we can develop a primary research which qualifies as research paper on our order placement list. Humans confront choices that are purely moral; humans, not dogs or cats, lay down moral laws for others and for themselves. All of our writers are native English speakers, and they know the difference between US and UK spelling and grammar.

While ultimately medical experimentation is more easily justified, is it really ethical to torture animals just because it directly improves healthcare? Dogs, cats and monkeys have special protection under UK law; other species must be used if possible Tweet this!

It draws an offensive moral conclusion from a deliberately devised verbal parallel that is disingenuous. Kant, on the other hand, accepted that animals could suffer, but, by lacking moral autonomy, they also lacked moral status.

In calculating the consequences of animal research, we must weigh all the long-term benefits of the results achieved, to animals and to humans, and in that calculation we must not assume the moral equality of all animate species. Animals play a relatively small yet very important part in scientific research, and help to develop invaluable drugs and treatments in the biomedical field.

However, we are not morally free to do anything we please to animals. Your dog has no right to daily exercise and veterinary care, but you do have the obligation to provide these things for him. He also acknowledges that there are differences between sentient species.

The holders of rights must have the capacity to comprehend rules of duty, governing all including themselves. I have a very specific research paper guideline. Notwithstanding all such complications, rights are in every case, claims, or potential claims, within a community of moral agents.The use of animals for research is controversial and even though there are numerous benefits to animal research, the ethical concerns surrounding the argument over animal research trump most others.

Usually, this middle view accepts experimentation on some, but not all, animals and aims to avoid unnecessary use of animals in scientific research by pursuing alternatives to animal testing.

Is The Use Of Animals For Research Purposes Justified?

The following sections briefly outline a few of the arguments for and against animal experimentation. Animal research has resulted in the development of vaccines for some of the deadliest diseases (e.g.

rabies). Tweet this! Medical devices, such as pacemakers and. However, the issue of using animals in medical research notably attract public attention because, to many people, it appears unnatural and cruel, even though the number of animals used for other purposes and the ill-effects exposed (eg.

blood sport) may often be greater, because the estimated 50 million animals used annually in experiments worldwide only account for about % of all animals used (Mepham. In Favor of Animal Testing - Their Argument Animal testing has been a part of the scientific process for quite some time.

Biomedical research relies on animals in order to develop new drugs and procedures to advance human and even animal health care, the US military.

The ethics of animal experimentation

An Argument in Favor of Animal Testing in Medical Research PAGES 1. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: animal rights, animal testing, medical research. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed.

- Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA.

An argument in favor of animal research
Rated 5/5 based on 72 review