It reflects struggle within and between classes as well as whatever materialism was prevalent in the society which the author lived in. Through Daisy, Fitzgerald glamorises the upper class women as better than all others, and Jordan and Daisy are definitely portrayed as a lot classier than working class women Myrtle and her sister Catherine.
This piece of literature is most definitely a product of the era it came of, and the opinions that society had. They were well known for their alternative style of life and ceaseless partying, and Fitzgerald earned a reputation as a symbol of the Jazz Age. Woe to you who laugh now, for you shall mourn and weep.
Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. From a Marxist perspective, this is symbolic of the fact that people will never be content with what they have, even when they appear to have everything.
Then you have Myrtle and her husband Wilson, who both represent the lower working class, and finally Gatsby — who started life as low class, and moved up in the world with his questionably acquired wealth.
In a truly Marxist world, there would be no excess wealth, nor poverty, and criticisms of the lower class would never occur.
Title eventually used as name given to Jesus, refering to an anointed person set apart for a special task such as a king. Emotion before economics However, a Marxist reading might closely examine the moment when Gatsby appears to prioritise love over money: The name given to the man believed by Christians to be the Son of God.
Money, wealth and class are central themes which fuel the plot, and the way in which characters act, think, interact with the other characters, and are portrayed.
Aristocratic rule in this area, people with money have the power, West Egg- also a rich luxurious area, but not as rich and luxurious- nobody really wants to be seen as unappealing, but less appealing than another great area, a way to still seem like the people who live there are still part of a upper high class.
He shows her disrespect even hitting her, she complains multiple times about him hurting her. And he did so: Fitzgerald is clearly critiquing the American dream, and the capitalism which consumes everyone, but by giving this couple such a glum existence, there is no real moral to the story.
This was a new type of stock trading at the time and Nick has to learn about it himself. For figs are not gathered from thornbushes, nor are grapes picked from a bramble bush.
Fitzgerald saw things from a double perspective, as he was raised amongst the upper class, yet came from more humble stock, and so is inclined to have a broader perspective than either class, which may be overly critical of the other.
It seems like he will be successful, as they start seeing each other, and Daisy even tells Tom she will leave him. The glamour of the novel exerts a powerful force to obscure the reality of this society, and this must be attributed to the use of Nick as a narrator, a character who is morally ambivalent to the extent that he is quite complicit in the cover-up surrounding the deaths of Myrtle and Gatsby.
Marxism says that society involves a struggle between the upper and lower class, which is in essence what Gatsby is struggling against, as he fights to be accepted as upper class for once and all, ridding himself of his more humble origins.
There are some minor characters who are less wealthy, and a smaller number of servants and workers who are glimpsed working in the novel. A Marxist reading of the text would focus on Wilson as a representative of the proletariat, and the depiction of the valley of ashes, located on the journey between Long Island and New York City.
He is the archetypal rags to riches story — but with no happy ending. Daisy is a popular, well-to-do girl, and it appears she is one of the few who sees through her own society for what it really is. This is expressed in religious terms but may have a worldly meaning.
This is also the case with Tom, who although has won the elusive Daisy as his wife, still wants more. It seems that Fitzgerald is alluding to the fact that it is much easier to get rich fast through unscrupulous means as Gatsby has done with his backstreet deals, while George has done the hard yards, owning his own car shop, and is tired all of the time.
With or without money, people are unhappy, according to this book.The Great Gatsby’s representation of American culture reveals the debilitating effects of capitalism on socioeconomic winners such as Tom, Daisy, and Gatsby, as well as on losers such as George and Myrtle.
Operating against The Great Gatsby’s powerful critique of capitalism is the work’s reinforcement of capitalism’s repressive ideology.
Marxist View of the Great Gatsby Words | 8 Pages. The Great Gatsby- Marxist Readings Tabatha Turner In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel of The Great Gatsby, he creates an artificial world where each character’s sole purpose in.
Marxist theory in Gatsby – Looking into sociology and class systems and how they relate in this piece of literature. Implying the idea Capitalism as mind control and getting lost in this facade of the American dream. Jul 07, · In my report I will be analysing the presence of Marxism in F.S.K Fitzgerald’s book, ‘The Great Gatsby’.
Whilst viewing this book through a critical lens, I discovered that many examples in the text work together to show the Marxist literary theory, of how everything relates back to wealth and financial status, reflecting on the.
Video: Marxism in The Great Gatsby This lesson explores Marxism in F. Scott Fitzgerald's classic, 'The Great Gatsby'. The lesson argues that using the principles of Marxism can help readers better understand Fitzgerald's examination of class conflicts.
Marxist interpretations The economics of class. A Marxist approach to The Great Gatsby might be concerned with the representations of social class, and the ways in which power and wealth are attained and retained by the characters.
Looking at the novel as a whole, it is seen to depict mostly the very wealthy members of society, who do not work and .Download